Skip to content

Alternatives to Flare

For some years now, it has become apparent that the prescribed use of pyrotechnics as a primary visual signal for distress alerting and location has a number of limitations that would suggest that the use of pyrotechnic visual signals for distress alerting is unreliable and that their carriage should now be reconsidered in the light of modern technology.

It is generally accepted that it is prudent to carry a method of sending a distress alert and identifying location should Search and Rescue (SAR) services be required.

In its position statement on the alternatives to flares for distress alerting the EBA includes a table providing guidance on alternatives to flares for both distress alerting and locating purposes.

The EBA encourages authorities to reconsider prescribing the carriage of pyrotechnics which are unreliable and potentially hazardous to health and instead look at the safety benefits and effectiveness of modern alternatives.